Corporate Psychology & Coaching

Superior human solutions for business

Insight Initiatives Pty Ltd

ACN 089 087 623

Sydney, NSW, Australia

+61 (0)2  9918 4639

 

Home Services Products Training Articles About Contact


 


Anonymous Threatening Phone Calls Being Made to Psychologists in Australia in 2010/2011

Who are the perpetrators?


Starting in 2010 and continuing into 2011, many Australian Pyschologists have been receiving anonymous telephone calls from a private number; a voice threatens them with legal action and criminal records unless they alter or remove their web sites and advertising with extreme urgency. 

Who is this bullying 'hit squad' of men and women making these harassing, threatening phone calls?  The perpetrators are notably articulate, yet employ all of the usual aggression and intimidation techniques of expert corporate bullies and unethical debt collectors.  They may call in the middle of the day, or even at weekends... 

At the core of their complaints are the titles and phrases that Psychologists use to describe their services or specialties, such as "organisational psychologist" or "counselling psychologist".  They insist that these terms are "illegal" and will result in "prosecution" and a "criminal record" if web sites are not amended or taken down "immediately" - and that Australian Psychology governing bodies say so. They purport to know details about their target - their qualifications, what they are allowed to do or not do, and forcefully state these assumed facts. 

At no point does the bully identify themselves, even when repeatedly pressed to do so.  Such is the weakness of the true bully - too scared to say who they are.  And so they should be, because what they are doing is a criminal offense in Australia.  (More on that in a minute...)

So here we have our regular, good-natured Psychologist, minding their own business...and the telephone rings.  An articulate yet oddly 'off' voice is on the line, asking questions in strange ways that quickly descend into a tirade of aggression and threats.  Our good-natured Psychologist is left shaking and in shock.  What was THAT all about?!  OMG, am I doing anything illegal?!  What were they talking about?!  Who were they?  Could it have been the APS, or the PBA?  Do I have to take my web site down?  For all but the most cool and collected among us, at least a little panic ensues.  Of course, this is exactly the effect that the bully had intended.

Strategies

Here are some of the tactics that these business bullies have been using to strike fear into the hearts of Australian Psychologists:

They open with a question that uses the phrase with which they hope to snare their target.  e.g. "Can I speak to a counselling psychologist please?" or "Are you an organisational psychologist?" or "Do you ever refer to yourself as an XYZ Psychologist?"

They know that Psychologists who provide counselling or organisational psychology services are likely to say yes, because of course to the general public these are generic terms - just descriptors of the type of service they are interested in.  It certainly would be inappropriate to respond to an enquiry with a lengthy semantic treatise correcting the enquirer's phrasing, "Well, we are psychologists and we have done counselling for 25 years but we are not counselling psychologists, we are psychologists who do counselling."  One can only imagine the expression on the face of the poor punter on the receiving end of that.

The bullies know this and no doubt imagine themselves to be terribly clever if they can get their target to say "yes" after using the two words in the forbidden order, and use this as the launching pad for their stream of tyrranical threats.  

Or if a non-target person answers the phone the bully may make up a story about seeking employment opportunities, asking "What does your business do exactly...?"  But they will then persist, calling back over the coming days or weeks until they get their target person.  Yes, this seems to be a time-consuming pursuit to which these bullies are very dedicated! 

 

If you are a Registered Psychologist and receive a call like this, what should you do?

1. Don't panic.  The bullies are wrong on most counts, say AHPRA and the PBA.  (We will explain in a minute...) 

2. Ask for their name, where they are calling from and their contact details.  If they won't tell you, just keep asking, broken record style.  Do not engage them in conversation or answer their questions.  You are under no obligation whatsoever to answer the questions of any anonymous caller and you should not.  Put the phone down.

3.  Make a note of the exact time of the call and the number it came in on.  Chances are that the bully believes that their call cannot be traced to them if they use a 'Private number' setting on their phone, but they are very wrong.  Making threatening or harassing phone calls is a Federal crime in Australia, so telecommunications companies are set up to deal with perpetrators, first by writing to them with an order to cease and desist, followed by cutting off their service if they don't and handing the account holder's name and address over to the Police.  So make clear notes of the time of the call.  Also make notes about the precise phrasing used, and the accent and tonality of the caller, as voices are readily identifiable. 

4.  Call the PBA and/or the APS to report your experience.  They are already aware and concerned about these calls and should be informed about any more of them, because there is a strong possibility that the offenders are Psychologists registered by the Board.  Not only does this behaviour directly contravene the APS Code of Ethics in very serious ways but, as mentioned, it is a Federal crime.  And frankly, it's just not very well adjusted, is it?  I don't know about you, but it troubles me deeply that there is any type of Psychologist out there, least of all a Counselling Psychologist, who considers this to be an appropriate way to behave in between providing 'therapy' sessions.

5.  Consider making a Police report because (did we mention it already?) it's a crime.  In Australia, making harassing, threatening phone calls can attract a jail term.  

6. Do not take your web site down or pull your advertising!!  That's just what these bullies want you to do.  But for your own peace of mind, check it for any of the new 'endorsed' job titles - yes, even if you have held that job title for 25 years, unfortunately.  Try not to use these terms if they don't 'officially' apply, at least until the teething troubles with the new endorsement system get worked out over the next year or two and things become clearer. 

There are only seven terms that the PBA would prefer you to avoid, leaving plenty of other job title options:  http://www.psychologyboard.gov.au/Registration-Standards.aspx

If your harasser claims that you cannot refer to yourself by other terms, such as Industrial, Occupational, Child, Therapeutic (or whatever) Psychologist, he is WRONG.  If he claims that you can no longer perform or advertise organisational, counselling, child (or whatever) psychology services, he is WRONG.  The new guidelines do not limit scope of practice in any way, and of course you have to describe your services so the public can find them.

Also check other online listings, because remember that third party listing providers won't know the precise semantics of every profession they list and are likely, understandably, to view terms such as 'counselling' or 'organisational' as generic.  If possible, contact them and ask for a category to be added or broadened, to allow you to advertise your services and qualifications properly.

Even if you have inadvertently been using one of the titles newly allocated to 'endorsed' status you will not have a criminal record and will not go to jail!  That's just ridiculous.  The bullies know that most Psychologists are mild characters, so they drop in scary phrases like "You will be prosecuted" and "You'll have a criminal record" purely in the hope of causing enough fear that you will shut up shop and get out of their way.  It is, frankly, sociopathic behaviour. 

Also know that the PBA are not a bunch of unreasonable, litigious meanies; they are on the side of competent, ethical Psychologists because that's who they want to be serving the Australian public.   They know that the guidelines have changed and that it means a period of adjustment pain, debate, reviews and amendments.  They will help you - call them.

7. Know that you are far from alone.  These bullies have been calling a lot of Psychologists, on a schedule, as some kind of project.  Ask around and you'll find plenty of examples.  Yes, these people are actually spending their lives sitting in front of their phones, using their precious time to maliciously threaten and harass strangers, when they could be getting the lawn mowed, playing with the kids, doing some work, or making a cup of tea instead.  Musn't it be fun to be them?!  Go figure.

8. Remember, normally functioning adults do not make anonymous threatening phone calls! They do not seek to intimidate and harass other people for commercial greed, ego satisfaction or other selfish interests.  These people are very foolish, taking the incredible risk of, at best, being struck off the Psychologist's register (if they are on it) and, at worst, attracting Police attention and being criminally prosecuted by the now large group of Psychologists they have threatened.  They are in far more danger than you could ever be for failing to delete your old job title from your web site!

Do you recognise these people?

Here are some of the voices and phrases used by the bullies.  Do you know who they are?  If your suspicions are strong and well founded, consider talking to the PBA, APS and/or to the Police about it:

1. Male, articulate.  Seems very angry, with an aggressive tone.  Asks "Do you refer to yourself as an XYZ psychologist?"  Incorrectly insists that using the job title "Industrial Psychologist" or "Corporate Psychologist" and several other terms is "illegal".  Uses phrases like: "This is just a courtesy call at the moment", "Playing ignorant", "I urge you to take this very seriously", "What you are doing is illegal", "You will be prosecuted", "You will have a criminal record".  He may mention the PBA, implying that his threats are supported by them.  One of his victims suspects that he might be an academic.  He is likely to be an older man, signing off calls with an indignant "Good day!" or "Good day to you!"

2. Female, very articulate.  Her voice has a strikingly pleasant southern/standard English accent and is beautifully metered.  This person could do voice-over work.  She sounds in her mid to late 30s, but may not be.  She claims "I am a Counselling Psychologist"(!) and that she will be referring her targets for "legal action".

To identify perpetrators one must always begin by asking "Who could gain from this?" - financially or even just egotistically or mean-spiritedly.  The 'follow the money' principle says that these are likely to be competitors who are, or who work in close partnership with, some the few Psychologists who carry one of the new 'endorsed' titles, either in business or in an accrediting institution.  If this is correct they should become increasingly easy to identify, as their own actions are narrowing the field; soon there will be only a handful of Psychologists left using these titles, focusing investigators very neatly in on the perpetrators themselves.

It is strange that they appear to be working as a team, attacking Psychologists across different specialties.  Are there any businesses or academic departments which employ both 'endorsed Organisational Psychologists' and 'endorsed Counselling Psychologists', and perhaps others?  If so, the rarity of that should make them even easier to identify.  That lovely accent also helps a lot...

Or perhaps they are bad apples hiding among the ranks of policy-makers or membership organisations - but this seems less likely as surely then they would then have had their facts straight.

Whoever they are, their immediate colleagues may know them to be unusually fixated on credentials.  They may also be very competitively motivated, with aggression or condascention being felt by those closest to them in a variety of ways.

-------------------------

How embarassing this behaviour is for the profession!  And how very disappointing it must be for the well-intentioned policy revisers who, no doubt, have put so much work over the past few years into trying to keep bad apples out of the system, not corralling them more persuasively into it.  We sincerely hope that we are wrong - but fear that we are not - that the offenders are among our fellow Registered Psychologists, or partners in their businesses or institutions.